<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motherboard Woes</title>
	<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36</link>
	<description>I knew what side I was on</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Brandy</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-1874</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-1874</guid>
					<description>I too had a very similar experince that I plan to write about, EXCEPT it was a retail item.  I feel they try to cheat customer all the time by sending refurb hoping no one will notice the switcheroo.

All in all, it took me almost a month to get the tv that I purchased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too had a very similar experince that I plan to write about, EXCEPT it was a retail item.  I feel they try to cheat customer all the time by sending refurb hoping no one will notice the switcheroo.</p>
<p>All in all, it took me almost a month to get the tv that I purchased.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: blergh</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-43</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 03:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-43</guid>
					<description>How are you so sure that &quot;....hand stacked against you deliberately as an attempt by the company to make a quick buck&quot;?

I mean, you had one bad experience... that's not nearlt a large enough sample to draw any conclusions about anything about NewEgg.  They said untested... you go on like they must have known it was defective, but there's nothing that says they even looked in the box.  Therefore, they don't *know* it's broken and rather than just throwing it in the dumpster they offer it for sale with adequate warning and a discount.  You took a risk buying an OB item, and you know that.


What possessed you to do that, I don't know.  You're asking for a possible headache just by trying it, was it worth the $25?  You apparently have had no experience RMAing anything because you pretty much always have to pay shipping.  That was part of the risk you assumed when you decided to buy it.


This looks to me like nothing but a knee-jerk reaction, trying to blame anything but one's self.  I mean come on, you're just lucky that faulty board didn't take any other hardware down with it.  If it was me, the very second I saw pieces of motherboard floating around, I would get on the phone - I wouldn't risk plugging in a brand-new CPU and other parts.

In your quest to save a few bucks, you put some money on the line and lost that risk.  Still, it seems you haven't learned that sometimes you get what you pay for.





As for the other person, not pre-ordering from NewEgg - that kind of thing can happen sometimes.  If anything you may be safer pre-ordering from NewEgg because they've had some trouble and have audited and fixed the system.  I know I'll still use NewEgg whenever I'm buying hardware or flash memory or software; great website + great service from what I've dealt with + speedy delivery.  The computer I type this on I built from components purchased through them, as well as the wireless router and cable modem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are you so sure that &#8220;&#8230;.hand stacked against you deliberately as an attempt by the company to make a quick buck&#8221;?</p>
<p>I mean, you had one bad experience&#8230; that&#8217;s not nearlt a large enough sample to draw any conclusions about anything about NewEgg.  They said untested&#8230; you go on like they must have known it was defective, but there&#8217;s nothing that says they even looked in the box.  Therefore, they don&#8217;t *know* it&#8217;s broken and rather than just throwing it in the dumpster they offer it for sale with adequate warning and a discount.  You took a risk buying an OB item, and you know that.</p>
<p>What possessed you to do that, I don&#8217;t know.  You&#8217;re asking for a possible headache just by trying it, was it worth the $25?  You apparently have had no experience RMAing anything because you pretty much always have to pay shipping.  That was part of the risk you assumed when you decided to buy it.</p>
<p>This looks to me like nothing but a knee-jerk reaction, trying to blame anything but one&#8217;s self.  I mean come on, you&#8217;re just lucky that faulty board didn&#8217;t take any other hardware down with it.  If it was me, the very second I saw pieces of motherboard floating around, I would get on the phone - I wouldn&#8217;t risk plugging in a brand-new CPU and other parts.</p>
<p>In your quest to save a few bucks, you put some money on the line and lost that risk.  Still, it seems you haven&#8217;t learned that sometimes you get what you pay for.</p>
<p>As for the other person, not pre-ordering from NewEgg - that kind of thing can happen sometimes.  If anything you may be safer pre-ordering from NewEgg because they&#8217;ve had some trouble and have audited and fixed the system.  I know I&#8217;ll still use NewEgg whenever I&#8217;m buying hardware or flash memory or software; great website + great service from what I&#8217;ve dealt with + speedy delivery.  The computer I type this on I built from components purchased through them, as well as the wireless router and cable modem.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-34</guid>
					<description>To me, NewEgg gave you a plenty good enough warning... If 25$ or even 9.50$ is alot of money for you, all the more reason not to make such a risky purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, NewEgg gave you a plenty good enough warning&#8230; If 25$ or even 9.50$ is alot of money for you, all the more reason not to make such a risky purchase.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ran Kailie</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-33</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-33</guid>
					<description>To Dan:

I couldn't return the board without attempting to see if it worked, and troubleshooting it with Asus first. So I HAD to take the time to connect it up and work with Asus's Support. 

Yeah I could have taken pictures and emailed them to NewEgg in an attempt to prove they had sent me something obviously broken, but I was giving them the benefit of the doubt. They mentioned that the boards were tested by the original manufacturer, so I assumed that perhaps it meant the board was refurbished and had been tested.

To Rob:

$9.50 puts almost a half tank of gas in my car. Sorry I'm not rich like you obviously are and $9.50 and saving $25 bucks can mean quite a bit to me, especially with how the price of gas and everything else is going lately.

The thing is with a reputable company you shouldn't be GAMBLING on something that is obviously defective. Something that's obviously defective should never even be sent out to a customer. Then said customer shouldn't have to even think about paying a 15% restocking fee for a defective item. Any other company I've worked with has always paid the shipping charges to send back defective products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Dan:</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t return the board without attempting to see if it worked, and troubleshooting it with Asus first. So I HAD to take the time to connect it up and work with Asus&#8217;s Support. </p>
<p>Yeah I could have taken pictures and emailed them to NewEgg in an attempt to prove they had sent me something obviously broken, but I was giving them the benefit of the doubt. They mentioned that the boards were tested by the original manufacturer, so I assumed that perhaps it meant the board was refurbished and had been tested.</p>
<p>To Rob:</p>
<p>$9.50 puts almost a half tank of gas in my car. Sorry I&#8217;m not rich like you obviously are and $9.50 and saving $25 bucks can mean quite a bit to me, especially with how the price of gas and everything else is going lately.</p>
<p>The thing is with a reputable company you shouldn&#8217;t be GAMBLING on something that is obviously defective. Something that&#8217;s obviously defective should never even be sent out to a customer. Then said customer shouldn&#8217;t have to even think about paying a 15% restocking fee for a defective item. Any other company I&#8217;ve worked with has always paid the shipping charges to send back defective products.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-32</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 05:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-32</guid>
					<description>What a stupid complaint. You gambled to save $25, you lost and you're out $9.50. Give me a break. Pffft, 9.50, what a load of bull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a stupid complaint. You gambled to save $25, you lost and you&#8217;re out $9.50. Give me a break. Pffft, 9.50, what a load of bull.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-30</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 17:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-30</guid>
					<description>I agree with some of the others here, you took a chance and they properly warned you. You're only out shipping, you should be happy with that. In your above statement you say they shouldn't sent you something that was obviously  defective, if it was obviously defective why did you install it and try it out? Why did you troubleshoot it? I'm guessing because it wasn't obviously defective, you said there was some physical damage but not enough for you to continue to install it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with some of the others here, you took a chance and they properly warned you. You&#8217;re only out shipping, you should be happy with that. In your above statement you say they shouldn&#8217;t sent you something that was obviously  defective, if it was obviously defective why did you install it and try it out? Why did you troubleshoot it? I&#8217;m guessing because it wasn&#8217;t obviously defective, you said there was some physical damage but not enough for you to continue to install it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ran Kailie</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-28</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 15:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-28</guid>
					<description>Thing is, this isn't a shitty ebay Seller, its a large well known company. Like Andy said, paying to return something you decided you didn't want is fine, but having to pay to return something they sent that was OBVIOUSLY defective is a load.

Tells me they lack any amount of quality control. Open Box is a gamble, but it should be a gamble not a hand stacked against you deliberately as an attempt by the company to make a quick buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is, this isn&#8217;t a shitty ebay Seller, its a large well known company. Like Andy said, paying to return something you decided you didn&#8217;t want is fine, but having to pay to return something they sent that was OBVIOUSLY defective is a load.</p>
<p>Tells me they lack any amount of quality control. Open Box is a gamble, but it should be a gamble not a hand stacked against you deliberately as an attempt by the company to make a quick buck.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nate MC</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-27</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 14:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-27</guid>
					<description>I've gotten a defective dvdrw drive from newegg and had to pay the shipping to send it back to them, it's just part of the deal. 

You would've had to pay to ship it to Asus to get a new one if you had gone that way instead, the only place that I've been to that didn't require you to pay the shipping on a defective item was PC Club who would take the return and mail it for you to the manufacturer, sadly they all closed up in this area of Washington.

Yeah it's nice to bitch and get some steam off but come on, it was an open box, you took the gamble and your only out $9.50, you should feel lucky that it wasn't more. I've lost more than that in just paypal fees getting my money back from shiatty eBay sellers.

Caveat emptor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotten a defective dvdrw drive from newegg and had to pay the shipping to send it back to them, it&#8217;s just part of the deal. </p>
<p>You would&#8217;ve had to pay to ship it to Asus to get a new one if you had gone that way instead, the only place that I&#8217;ve been to that didn&#8217;t require you to pay the shipping on a defective item was PC Club who would take the return and mail it for you to the manufacturer, sadly they all closed up in this area of Washington.</p>
<p>Yeah it&#8217;s nice to bitch and get some steam off but come on, it was an open box, you took the gamble and your only out $9.50, you should feel lucky that it wasn&#8217;t more. I&#8217;ve lost more than that in just paypal fees getting my money back from shiatty eBay sellers.</p>
<p>Caveat emptor.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: This is the dumbest complaint I've ever heard. You bought something they told you they didn't test, warbed you it could have problems, and when it did offered to issue a refund.
You gambled, and lost the cost of shipping it back, and you didn't have to do</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-25</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 09:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-25</guid>
					<description>www.google.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.google.com' rel='nofollow'>www.google.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ransim.net/?p=36#comment-24</guid>
					<description>If you paid for it on your credit card you could just tell newegg that you are going to take it up with the credit card company (so they'll get charged more due to chargeback costs). You should not have to pay shipping to return damaged goods - shipping costs should only be charged when you change your mind or if they don't work with something else that you have (as opposed to being plain broken).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you paid for it on your credit card you could just tell newegg that you are going to take it up with the credit card company (so they&#8217;ll get charged more due to chargeback costs). You should not have to pay shipping to return damaged goods - shipping costs should only be charged when you change your mind or if they don&#8217;t work with something else that you have (as opposed to being plain broken).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
